![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Master Post
After many hours of wrangling our lawyer got a copy of the DHS's "Individual Service Plan" for myself and my husband. It's a hoot. Counselors we've shown this to have hit the roof. It only has one signature attached to it, and that isn't anyone I've seen or talked to. Each section has a different date, and a different due date. Everything is out of compliance with the official state practices. Some of it is against state law, other parts of itare against official insurance practices. Some of it isn't even worded in complete sentences.
Part 1 says:
"...will correct her home deficiencies to corrrect but arenot(sp) limited to replaceing the dead bolt lock"
This is:
1) ungrammatical,
2) incorrectly spelled, and
3) the deadbolt lock they want me to remove is next to a front door window that's already been broken into before. The insurance people would hit the roof over that!
Part 2 wants the children's medical/dental records BUT doesn't offer to pay for them. I learned today that's not kosher.
Part 3 says:
"...will provide proof/confirmation that the children's educational needs are being met."
That's ILLEGAL in Mississippi.
Part 4:
"the dead bolt will be replaced with a safer type of lock..."
DHS, meet insurance people. Insurance people, meet DHS.
There's no "client" signature. There's no "social worker" signature. There is an "ASWS" signature -- but no date. I was told that the ASWS is the social worker supervisor. BUT the person who signed in the "ASWS signature" slot is not a social worker supervisor. She's not even a social worker. Melody Hamilton, who has the only signature on the entire document that they faxed our lawyer, is a student intern working in their office.
How many ways can you say FAIL!
From dh:
We need an easy to use video recorder.
It needs to get OK pictures in indoor light but have really good audio pickup for recording any of these "encounters" or "interviews."
Any recommendations?
After many hours of wrangling our lawyer got a copy of the DHS's "Individual Service Plan" for myself and my husband. It's a hoot. Counselors we've shown this to have hit the roof. It only has one signature attached to it, and that isn't anyone I've seen or talked to. Each section has a different date, and a different due date. Everything is out of compliance with the official state practices. Some of it is against state law, other parts of itare against official insurance practices. Some of it isn't even worded in complete sentences.
Part 1 says:
"...will correct her home deficiencies to corrrect but arenot(sp) limited to replaceing the dead bolt lock"
This is:
1) ungrammatical,
2) incorrectly spelled, and
3) the deadbolt lock they want me to remove is next to a front door window that's already been broken into before. The insurance people would hit the roof over that!
Part 2 wants the children's medical/dental records BUT doesn't offer to pay for them. I learned today that's not kosher.
Part 3 says:
"...will provide proof/confirmation that the children's educational needs are being met."
That's ILLEGAL in Mississippi.
Part 4:
"the dead bolt will be replaced with a safer type of lock..."
DHS, meet insurance people. Insurance people, meet DHS.
There's no "client" signature. There's no "social worker" signature. There is an "ASWS" signature -- but no date. I was told that the ASWS is the social worker supervisor. BUT the person who signed in the "ASWS signature" slot is not a social worker supervisor. She's not even a social worker. Melody Hamilton, who has the only signature on the entire document that they faxed our lawyer, is a student intern working in their office.
How many ways can you say FAIL!
From dh:
We need an easy to use video recorder.
It needs to get OK pictures in indoor light but have really good audio pickup for recording any of these "encounters" or "interviews."
Any recommendations?
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 12:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 12:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 12:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 01:52 am (UTC)~
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 02:15 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 02:46 am (UTC)Something like that, anyway.
~
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 05:12 pm (UTC)Indeed! Some folks are utterly contemptible - I mean, we knew that already in this case but JEEZE....
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 12:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 12:56 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 12:57 am (UTC)Not even in the ballpark of decent human beings. :/
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 11:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-21 03:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 12:53 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 12:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 02:05 am (UTC)May the passing of time shed more light on this farce so it comes to a just and fitting end soon!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 03:37 am (UTC)next moves
Date: 2010-10-19 07:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 12:19 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 01:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 02:16 pm (UTC)Don't compromise your case; but thanks for sharing what details you can! We're rooting for you! :D
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 02:21 pm (UTC)Scan all documents and save them to an offsite dedicated server. If you need assistance in that, I can offer up my own web hosting for that purpose.
Take pictures of everything imaginable.
The door, the door knobs, the house, yard, everything under the sun until the mere thought of operating a camera nauseates you. Do this in both digital format, and hard copies you have to have developed.
Load pictures to offsite hosting, make doubles of hard copy photos. Keep one set on you, and store the others at a safe place. Maybe safety box in another city entirely. Same with hard copies of documents.
Good luck and I hope this all works out. I agree with the whole alert the media thing, and keep jumping heads if you have to. Perhaps a letter to your govenor or senator is in order since the DA wants to be a bunch of professional asshat wearing douchecanoes.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 05:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 11:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-20 09:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-20 11:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-20 01:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-21 02:26 am (UTC)CL's been a calm and reasonable member of several online communities for years, and is respected by her business contacts. In the unlikely event that she's snowing everybody, that'll come out in time. Meanwhile if these meth-dealers (or whatever they are) do exist, they can't conduct their business under spotlights. So who benefits from these anonymous posts for silence and disbelief?
~
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-20 11:33 am (UTC)Posting freely about how there's a conspiracy in her county and the entire state of Mississippi only serves to make her and her husband look paranoid. This will NOT help their case. Nor is it helpful for her to post her full name and address on the internet.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-20 01:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-20 02:21 pm (UTC)Whether or not
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-20 02:27 pm (UTC)There is however a metric crap tonne of evidence that child protective services can use to say she is batshit crazy and remove her children. Including the fact that she's posted her and her husbands names and address for the whole entire interwebz to see.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-20 02:32 pm (UTC)I also wanted to add that
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-20 02:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-20 06:30 pm (UTC)Makes a good scare tale for Halloween, I suppose.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-21 03:38 am (UTC)I'm not naive. I've seen, even helped investigate, online hoaxes perpetrated upon online communities. Enough to know that money isn't always the motivating factor in such cases. I'm just not seeing the same hallmarks here.
That said...I do believe there is some danger in making these posts public. What's to keep the people harassing her from finding them and using them to their advantage?
However, while the posts remain public, I'll be following the story with interest and offering what moral support I can.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-21 11:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-21 03:51 am (UTC)Her posts sound worried, but are coherent and well-organized. I would hardly call them "batshit crazy."
As another poster mentioned, CL is a well-respected member of several online fandoms, and has been so for some years. So, I'm going to continue to give her the benefit of the doubt, at least until evidence is presented to the contrary.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-21 02:34 am (UTC)I'm thrilled that you found a lawyer, as the earlier post I'd read indicated the lawyers you'd initially contacted didn't want to touch the case.
The best advice I can offer (which your lawyers have already probably offered, as well) is, document, document, document. In my work as a union leader, I've seen arbitrators decide cases in our favor because our people have been able to pull out their journals, etc, and document the day on which a given conversation happened with a record made very shortly after said conversation, and therefore given more weight than someone's memory of an event months or years in the past. I don't remember if you were able to take a picture of your baby's feet on the day of the first incident, but that's the kind of thing I'm talking about. Things that are time-stamped in some way are even better.
I hope your nightmare ends quickly, and that those responsible for harassing you suffer the consequences of recklessly endangering your family. Until then, I will keep you in thoughts and prayers.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-24 01:19 am (UTC)The diference between your circumstance and mine however is that nothing overtly horrible has happened to you (and there'a a good chance this will get worse, a real good one) yet, even though what's already happened is pretty damn bad.
Our case is just getting underway after years of neglect and distain towards my mother (and forget the fact that she's smarter than all of them together, they thought just because she had no teeth - most of the were punched out of her mouth for fucks sake) and we're looking forward to going on holiday for the first time ever with the settlement that's heading our way. I mean, there's no way in hell that it's ever going to erase everything that's happened to us - even without the help of a corrupt system - but it's a sign that someones listened to us and realsied just how wrong it all was.
In an odd way it's comforting to know it's not just in Australia where this shit happens and yet very distressing that this is happening to you and your family.
I've leaned that DHS knows jackshit about anything. Did you know that I haven't seen three of my little brothers in almost three years? We're only just now getting closer to seeing them.
My mum got and still is being fucked around by ours. I think if an issue such as ours is getting better, there's hope for you.
Oh and fuck off unhelpful anons. What, you just come in here thinking you know everything? How long have you know about this woman? Have you spent years getting to know her? Have you ever done business with her? I'm betting not. At least this way there are others who have a knowledge that this is happening. Go troll somewhere else, you have no power here. And it's not paranoia, this shit happens, I should know. Anyway, are you (I'm guessing you're the same person) so nieve to believe that leaving children with the government is safe? it's not. There is a world full of sick people out there how can't wait to get their sick hand all over children for god knows what reason. The goverment either doesn't really care or there are people who care that aren't in a possition to help or is too snowed under and under staffed with under qualified people who don't know what the hell they're doing.