Yep, I think you're giving them too much credit -- I'm guessing over-complication to confuse the trail. Something like: it didn't occur to them that CL would get a lawyer, so the never wrote up the report -- originally they thought that if you don't write it up then it didn't happen, therefor any questioning CL does about the "non-existent" visit makes her look paranoid. Problem with that was when the demand for info came down through official channels instead of through the hysterically panicked calls they expected, they panicked. They threw together something that included the basics of the complaints, maybe making it look incompetently prepared because they thought that would throw suspicion off of them. They used the student intern's name when they forged the signature because they consider her a soft target, likely because the actual ASWS is better able to defend herself. They probably think they've got the clues going in so many different directions that with everyone under suspicion the inevitable investigation won't be able to sort out the innocent from the guilty.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
regna
(no subject)
Date: 2010-10-19 02:46 am (UTC)Something like that, anyway.
~