crabby_lioness: (Default)
[personal profile] crabby_lioness

There are over one hundred characters in the full-blown Arthurian Legends.  In my opinion the most difficult by far to write well is Lancelot.  If Arthur and Merlin are the foundation, then Lancelot is the keystone.  His strengths and virtues bind together the soaring arch of Arthurian Chivalry, and his weaknesses bring it crashing down.  So it is absolutely essential that any retelling establish at Lancelot's introduction his strength, his courage, his valor, his selflessness, his beauty, his kindness, his respect and utter adoration for Arthur, his love of Guenevere, his desperation to do anything to prove himself, and his fatal willingness to let those he cares about talk him into doing things that he knows are bad ideas.

 

What can I say about Episode 5 other than, "They got him right"?  While he's young enough that the form of the great tragic hero is still embryonic, all his requisite virtues and flaws are distinct.  I can mentally get from "here" (this episode) to "there" (the familiar Arthurian Legends beginning at the point when Arthur as King), and that is the basis by which I judge this series.

Last episode laid the groundwork for one of the key elements of Arthurian chivalry:  everybody is worth fighting for.  This episode lays the groundwork for two more:  everybody deserves a chance to fight, and there needs to be another basis for the Code of Camelot besides birthright.  It's an example of Uther's overwhelming hubris that he believes only the sons of his best fighters could be loyal knights when the show comes flat out and says that he didn't choose his original knights that way.  Uther's laws put in place to help select loyal knights are in fact shown to be handicapping Arthur.

I found the portrayal of Lancelot a bit too restrained at first, as a sense of his desperation is crucial to understanding his character, but it grew on me over time.  No need to have him start out too desperate.

Kudos for the Geoffrey of Monmouth shout-out; the real life scholar was the first person to write down the tales of Arthur and Merlin.  He was a real Merlin fan.  He changed the wizard's name from Myrddin to Merlin and wrote three books about him, a book of Merlin's prophecies which was a bestseller for over 300 years, a legendary history of Britain which contains the first recorded reference of King Arthur, and a Latin version of the story of Merlin's life for the international market.

The story did what it was supposed to do in an efficient manner but there was no grace to it, unlike last episode.  This is a real shame; if I were a Lancelot fan I would go so far as to call it criminal.  The exception was two scenes during the celebration:  the Merlin/Gwen scene which I'll talk about in Part 2 and the Lancelot/Arthur scene.  The scene where Merlin asks Gwen, "If you had to...Lancelot or Arthur?" is cute and saucy -- and heartbreakingly forboding of the question that will someday destroy her.  "If you had to...."  It is Guenevere's curse that she gets everything she wants.  But someday is not today.
 
The other really good scene is where Arthur eyes Morgana and Lancelot eyes Gwen, each complimenting the beauty of "the lady" and thinking the other guy is talking about the same girl he's talking about but they aren't.  Lancelot looks at Gwen with genuine interest, while Arthur looks at Morgana as if she represents a problem he's not ready to deal with yet.  Once again Gwen is completely off Arthur's radar.  He sparks more with Merlin and Lancelot than with any of the women, but as delightful as those sparks are to watch they might not be romantic.  Arthur doesn't really appear interested in romance with anyone of either gender.  He's too busy being the Royal Heir/Champion and mentally re-imaging Camelot.

Whatever his orientation, I don't think Arthur has allowed himself to think about romance much.  Arthur is the Master of all Princely Duties, like fighting and giving orders.  That list doesn't include "picking your own bride".  It has "shutting up and marrying who you are told to marry" instead.  I don't think Arthur sees why he has to bother with things like courting when someone else is going to pick for him.  The fact that the lady in question (namely Morgana) might like to be courted anyway either hasn't registered or gets dismissed as too deeply ironic for words.

One princely skill we see that he has clearly mastered is the fine art of turning a blind eye when it is in his interest -- Camelot's interest -- for him to do so.  It's one of this story's many ironic foreshadowings that we first get a clear picture of it in the episode that introduces Lancelot.  I suspect he's already been doing this for Merlin in regards to his magic, but seeing him do it for someone else is a nice bit of circumstantial evidence in that argument's favor.  The other bit of circumstantial evidence in this episode is that Arthur and Lancelot are supposed to be equals on the field of battle.  If Lancelot can hear Merlin speaking a spell from that far away through a helmet and over thundering hoofbeats, what makes you think Arthur can't hear the same thing when more lightly encumbered?

The scene where Gaius declares how much Merlin means to him falls a bit flat; however it reminds us that Merlin is not, in Gwen's words, one of those "rough, tough, save the world types" that she admires like Arthur and Lancelot..  Merlin is absolutely, utterly terrified at confrontingthe Griffon again, but he"ll do it to save Arthur's life.  In one of the many moments of forshadowing in this episode, i couldn't help rembering that in the early versions of the Merlin legends the malady that eventually takes him from Arthur's side matches the description of PTSD.

Merlin isn't interested in being anything more than a friend to Gwen.  While he's friends with many people at the moment he (literally) only has eyes for Arthur.  (Except for Nimue last episode, but I think that qualified as "getting burned".)  So it's nice to see sparks of genuine interest between Gwen and Lancelot in both directions.

Morgana wasn't much used this time.  It's getting annoying how the writers can use both boys but only one girl per episode.   The other annoyance is how often I find myself thinking, "This was a good episode, but it could have been better."

Yippee!  Tonight I get to watch Episode 6!
 

Episodes 1-3

Episode 4 Review: Innocence at Camelot

 

Episode 6: (Death Is) A Remedy to Cure All Ills.

Episode 7:  Deception for Dummies

Episode 8:  Deception for Non-Dummies 

Episode 9:  What Color is Your Fairy Tale?

Episode 10:  The Practical Exam
 
Episode 11:  Today is a Good Day to Die

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-04 05:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] feilongfan.livejournal.com
> If Lancelot can hear Merlin speaking a spell from that far away through a helmet and over thundering hoofbeats, what makes you think Arthur can't hear the same thing when more lightly encumbered?

But Arthur passed out in that scene, right?

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-04 05:11 pm (UTC)
winter: (fandom - Lancelot)
From: [personal profile] winter
I'm glad to find someone who liked Lancelot as much as I did :) Throughout this episode, I found myself going, "Oh, that's so him" - and all of him, the chivalry and pride and stubbornness. They nailed him in particular in the last scene where he intervenes between Arthur and Uther, because that's the guy for whom the ideals, and his king, are more important than his own dream and place in life.

(And they had him on a cart, during his fight with Arthur. The show wins me just for that little touch.)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-04 06:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slashweaver.livejournal.com
Just a very quick note to say how much I'm enjoying reading your careful, useful and provocative thoughts on the Merlin episodes. I may not always entirely agree with you, but you make me think, and I love that!

I am friending you so I don't miss anything. :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-04 06:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crabby-lioness.livejournal.com
He's not passed out when Merlin helped him defeat the afanc in Episode 3.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-04 06:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crabby-lioness.livejournal.com
I'm not that fond of Lancelot the character, but I found this episode the best portrayal of him I've seen other than White's version.

This show wins on so many levels for the fight scenes. I'm halfway expecting full blown swashbuckling before it's over with.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-04 06:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crabby-lioness.livejournal.com
Thank you. :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-04 06:22 pm (UTC)
winter: (elisabeth - rar)
From: [personal profile] winter
I wouldn't put it past them ;) Though on a certain level, they also win for not going for the uber-flashy swashbuckling - they're conscious of the limitations of armour and heavy swords, and that is worth glee in itself.

Merlin: Like the goofy puppy who runs head-on into a door and you still think he's adorable.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-04 06:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stealingpennies.livejournal.com
I'm really enjoying these episode reviews. I think because I've seen the whole series it's hard to recapture how I felt episode by episode so it's nice to see how the characters/stories are viewed by someone coming to them fresh, for the first time.

Personally, I hold to the view tht Arthur does know about the magic and has decided to keep quiet as the best option. I feel sure, however, that the producers will sacrifice continuity and sense for 'big drama' if it suits them next season.

It's interesting how much of the 'history' has been incorporated amongst the crack.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-04 07:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slashweaver.livejournal.com
Do you have a book recommendation for me...? I am wanting to catch up on Arthuriana now, and in my dreams I see a lovely big tome giving a good detailed overview of the legends - not necessarily through to the present day - and perhaps some consideration of where/how they could have fit into actual history.

I used to be so into Arthurian legend in my teens and early 20s, but eventually got bored with it and gave up. Gosh, that was 20 years ago now! Back in those days, I was into fiction, so really all my 'knowledge' comes from novels and films. These days I'm far more into non-fiction, and Serious Research. But I don't know where to start.

Thank you in any case! Your posts are Serious Research in their own right. :-)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-04 08:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crabby-lioness.livejournal.com
Not really, sorry. Most of my knowledge is that old as well, and my university was very Old School back then. None of this subtextural analysis for them, thank-you-very-much. The best thing I've read on it recently was an essay in Ronald Hutton's _Witches, Druids And King Arthur_ http://www.amazon.com/Witches-Druids-Arthur-Ronald-Hutton/dp/185285555X/ which examined the trends in Arthurian research in the 20th Century, but that's just one essay out of the book.

Sarcasticchick might be able to help you. http://sarcasticbabble.livejournal.com/ I know she'd read a lot on Arthur. I'm really more of a Robin Hood fan, but the latest rendition of that isn't worth watching sober.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-04 08:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crabby-lioness.livejournal.com
In my younger days I would have watched it all in one lump, but these days I enjoy taking my time with it. Or maybe that's just the children wearing may out. ;)

It's interesting how much of the 'history' has been incorporated amongst the crack.</>

All together now, "A spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down...."

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-04 08:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crabby-lioness.livejournal.com
I can't help thinking the reenactors must be enjoying it for the fight scenes alone. They deserve a lot of credit for making it look real, and for people coming back from a fight looking like they've been put through a wringer.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-04 08:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cometotheedge.livejournal.com
I find it really interesting that you describe this ep as having no grace to it (compared to Poisoned Chalice) because I had a similar reaction. This one I think strives for a mythical feel - the dialogue in particular is more consciously 'Arthurian' than the first four eps. Whereas ep4 keeps the show's own unique appeal - the characters behaving as teenagers actually do - but at the same time creates moments straight out of the traditional myth. Specifically Arthur and Nimueh's encounter in the forest, which is full on Burne-Jones/La Belle-Dame-Sans-Merci. It's an interesting illustration of the effect different writers bring to a show.

As for looking forward to ep6...you're into a run now that lasts pretty much till the end of the series - every single ep brings something awesome :D

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-04 08:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crabby-lioness.livejournal.com
This series is the candy for the babies. It needs to slip right in nice and easy. "Here, you'll like this. Liked it? Want more? Here's Howard Pyle. Want more than that? Here's Mallory...."

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-04 09:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cometotheedge.livejournal.com
exactly. Ray Harryhausen's Jason of the Argonauts had much more to do with my reading Classics at uni than any other translation of Greek myth. See also Adam & the Ants videos on my love of costume drama ;)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-04 09:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mossylawn.livejournal.com
I'm not really a fan of Lancelot, but I do find this version of him much more...digestable than usual. He's got good chemistry (romantic and other) with Gwen, Merlin and Arthur respectively, though I am not exactly looking forward to his return all that much, I still find him quite dull.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-04 09:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crabby-lioness.livejournal.com
I've read and seen so many bad Lancelots it's an effort not to cringe at his name. This one was decent, but he needed a better script.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-04 11:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] clancy-s.livejournal.com
I agree wrt the characterisations of Arthur, Lancelot and Merlin - the show does very well with them.

wrt Arthur hearing Merlin casting the spell at the Afanc - one can make a good case for it but I suspect the producers intent is that Arthur doesn't know, which I think is one of the story telling weaknesses.

wrt featuring both the girls: although the show is called "Merlin" IMO it's primarily about Merlin and Arthur with the other 4 regulars being supporting characters. We don't usually get balanced amounts of Gaius and Uther either...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-04 11:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mossylawn.livejournal.com
I know, I made a blatant facepalm while seeing the episode title, I'm happy that it didn't turn out to be a disaster though.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-05 12:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crabby-lioness.livejournal.com
Since tis is a BBC production, I generally assume a greater level of sophistication than I do with American productions.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-05 05:54 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] betsyli.livejournal.com
Fantastic analysis, once again.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-05 05:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crabby-lioness.livejournal.com
Thanks. Just posted #6.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-05 11:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slashweaver.livejournal.com
Thank you for this. In the meantime, I went browsing on Amazon and found 'The Oxford Guide to Arthurian Literature and Legend' (Alan Lupack) and also 'The Arthurian Handbook' (Norris J Lacy et al). Both seem to do what I'm after, so I am starting with the former. I will bother sarcasticchick when I have specific questions! Thanks again, and looking forward to more of your reviews.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-05 06:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] morcalivan.livejournal.com
Another fantastic review! I just finished reading through them all and I HAVE to go rewatch the episodes now. I will admit I am not very knowledgeable about the legends and pretty much just take the epsiodes at face value, but reading these insights just makes the story take on so much more depth and I think I am falling in love with Merlin all over again. Thank you ^_^

(no subject)

Date: 2009-02-05 09:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] crabby-lioness.livejournal.com
Thank you for reading. :)

King Arthur Books

Date: 2009-09-22 05:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] koft2009.livejournal.com
Hey All,
But I too was a diehard King Arthur fan, and like you got sick of knowing the ending all the time. I thought that I would throw in my two cents. However, I am new to the show since it just finished airing in the US like 2 weeks ago, but I do not think we will be seeing it again. Those types of shows do not do well here--remember this is the place where BSG won no awards and The Sarah Connor Chronicles was cancelled. Irregardless, I too was a huge King Arthur fan junior high through college and read them all. I actually talk about it in my journal if you're interested http//koft2009.livejournal.com. I just posted about the show vs. the books that I have read, so check it out.

Irregardless my favorite, all time book about the Arthur legend is The Mists of Avalon-by Marian Zimmer Bradley. I read it gosh, almost 20 years ago, and it is still my favorite one. It is a long read as it starts from the pov of Igraine when she is young until the death of Arthur. The majority of the book is from the pov of Morgaine le Fey.
I have yet to see a film that is worthy of the legend; they did a TV movie of this book, and it was a disgrace, as are most of the movies. But I can say Excalibur was none too bad--

crabby_lioness: I very much enjoy your pov on this show, Primeval, and your TW ones as well. It's nice to read intelligent writing w/a fresh perspective that I have not seen in many other write-ups.
k

Re: King Arthur Books

Date: 2009-09-23 12:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slashweaver.livejournal.com
Heh! Sick of knowing the ending all the time... Yes, I know what you mean! One of the things I love about oure new version of 'Merlin' is that I can't pin down where they're going with it all. They have changed things about enough that I am intrigued to know what happens next. What with that, and 'Spamalot', I figure there's life in the Arthurian legends yet!

I will check out your lj, thank you! I hope that 'Merlin' will continue in America. It really means a lot to people here that it's the first UK show to be bought by a major US network in 30 years. I am hoping that the BBC will fund the full five years that the creators envisage, and any success at all in the US market (even a small share of it) may help. {crosses fingers}

I am about to re-read 'Mists of Avalon'. I enjoyed it way back when, so I am interested to see if I'll enjoy it again now!

Ooh, I am enormously fond of the movie 'Excalibur'. It made me really cry when I watched it again recently. I love it for trying to tell the whole story, from Uther's failed attempt to be High King, through to Arthur's final battle with Mordred. Just amazing stuff. A product of its times, but then I'm a product of those times, too!

Thank you for your input! ♥

Profile

crabby_lioness: (Default)
crabby_lioness

September 2020

S M T W T F S
  123 45
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios